AMBR editorial policy: sourcing, review and use of AI
Under the AMBR editorial policy, guides are written by the research team, checked against primary sources, reviewed for compliance and dated; AI may assist with drafting, but no sentence is published until a named person has fact-checked it, and the author and reviewer placeholders in this prototype must be replaced with real, credentialed people before publication.
Version 0.1, prototype text. Published .
In short
Primary sources first. Every figure has a source and a date. A named person checks every sentence, whoever or whatever drafted it. Corrections are dated and visible.
1. Who writes and who reviews
Guides on this site carry a team byline: AMBR Research Team, reviewed by the Head of Compliance. Both are placeholders in this prototype. Before publication, each guide needs a named author with relevant experience, a profile page that lists qualifications and other work, and a named compliance reviewer. The guide on legal responsibility also needs a legal reviewer.
Press releases on the live site are signed "By AMBR" and name no person. That suits a release, not a guide about money or regulation, where readers need to know who answers for the text. The About page describes the company and its leadership.
2. Sources and fact-checking
Writers use primary sources first: regulators and their public registers, standards bodies, and the company's own filings and press releases. Every figure carries its source and the date it was read. Licence facts are copied from the register in the regulator's own words, and a status is never upgraded.
Each guide has a fact-check log with one line per claim: the claim, the source, the date and the person who checked it. A statement that cannot be verified is removed or marked as unconfirmed.
3. Use of AI in our content
AI tools may help draft text, titles, descriptions, structured data and image descriptions. Nothing AI-assisted is published until a named person has fact-checked and approved it, and the reviewer's name and the date are recorded for each page. AI is never listed as an author and is not used to produce pages in bulk. Where automation played a material part in a page, the page says so.
This prototype was drafted with AI assistance. Its author and reviewer names are placeholders. They must be replaced with real, credentialed people, who complete the fact-check, before any page is published.
4. How the products' AI is tested
Editorial review covers what AMBR writes. It does not cover what Ambre and MIA produce. How AMBR tests the agents themselves has not been published. That account belongs on the security page, which is where to look for how the agents are tested.
5. Independence, corrections and updates
AMBR is a commercial company, and its guides mention its own products where they are relevant. Each mention is labelled as an AMBR product. Guides carry no paid placements, no price predictions and no claims about investment performance.
When a factual error is found, the page is corrected and a dated note says what changed. Figures are never edited silently. Pillar guides are reviewed every 6 to 12 months, and trust pages such as licences, security and contact are reviewed whenever a fact changes. A visible date changes only when the content changes.
To report an error, use the contact page. The learn hub lists the guides published under this policy.
Found a mistake?
Tell us which page and which sentence, and where you found the correct fact.